FieldHockeyCorner.com

2011 Ratings as of November 20, 3:00 pm
by Average Computer Rating (ACR)

Division 3

North Atlantic

Great Lakes  NE  NE East  NE West  New England  New York North Atlantic South  South Atlantic  West    All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1Skidmore18-2 97.90.6470.563
2William Smith16-5 96.70.6260.580
3Hamilton5-10 96.20.5360.604
4Cortland12-7 95.60.5810.565
5RPI11-5 95.40.5810.546
6Stevens11-8 95.20.5570.550
7Oneonta13-7 95.00.5370.500
8Rochester12-6 94.80.5230.476
9Washington & Jefferson14-5 94.70.5300.461
10Saint Lawrence9-8 94.50.5230.521
11Utica11-8 94.40.5110.488
12Geneseo9-10 94.30.5170.532
13New Paltz8-10 94.00.5080.530
14Nazareth7-11 93.20.4700.496
15Brockport9-8 93.20.4730.454
16Vassar6-9 93.20.4720.495
17Hartwick6-11 92.70.4500.483
18Ithaca5-11 92.60.4400.483
19Oswego6-9 92.60.4340.445
20Union2-15 92.40.4380.545
21Elmira2-12 90.70.3820.462
22Wells5-8 90.30.3340.318
23Morrisville1-17 90.10.3360.429
1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record

4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • These calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The SOS and ACR have no bearing on selection to the NCAA, while the NCAA's official RPI will be produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home